[ SECRET POST #3216 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3216 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
(The Blacklist)


__________________________________________________



03.
[The Sum Of Us/Russell Crowe]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Dan and Phil]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Tokyo Ghoul:re]


__________________________________________________



06.
[dick grayson]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Scandinavia and the World]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Doctor Who]


__________________________________________________



09.
[One Piece]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Lost Dimension]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Sleepy Hollow]










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 075 secrets from Secret Submission Post #460.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

"a character that has opposite sex relations but there's nothing "canon" to suggest that it's impossible they might be bi"

This also fits the same description though.

[(Anonymous)]

Maybe I didn't word myself right. As opposed to the first category which is stricter, a character that could reasonably be bisexual, with more examples of interactions with same-sex people that could be interpreted as romantic/sexual, but there's no canon clarification about sexual orientation either way. A character that someone could go "s/he's bi/gay" and it wouldn't be surprising or disjointed at all. As opposed to a character who never seems to have any interactions that could remotely be interpreted that way, and if who they were confirmed as being bi, there'd be no real canon evidence of the character expressing that orientation even mildly.

[(Anonymous)]

Still no distinction for me. But it may be that my threshold for being surprised is much higher than yours. If there's nothing in the canon that explicitly says they are not queer, I assume queer is a possibility because nothing says a queer character ever has to explicitly express their queerness.

[(Anonymous)]

SA

I mean, it wouldn't surprise me if they turned out not to be later, but both types would be ostensibly straight to me.