[ SECRET POST #3217 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3217 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 064 secrets from Secret Submission Post #460.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[kitelovesyou]

I'm talking about the difference with the guy in the bathtub versus say the nuclear bomb project. one was an intuitive leap of logic by random chance and the other was a group of guys getting together and applying their minds to the problem.

Whaaaaaat. I assume you are referring to Archimedes? You understand there's a difference between scientific theory and the application of scientific theory to technology? I think you don't, because you talk about "advancements in science".

Assuming you think the latter should be more like the former, you also understand that there are many ways humans have arrived at a scientific theory?

I ...really don't understand what central points you're trying to make in your comments. I thought we were talking about proof? But you're now talking about designing molecules? What has that got to do with proof? You think believing in scientific theories and scientific methodology is "fervour"? Um?