case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-11-01 02:32 pm

[ SECRET POST #3224 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3224 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.










Notes:

Sorry about early, have stuff to do!

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 042 secrets from Secret Submission Post #461.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
dethtoll: (Default)

Re: A quick straw pole.

[personal profile] dethtoll 2015-11-01 10:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Says a lot of people, actually. :( Well, not that very specific source, but people tend to buy into anecdotal evidence over empirical evidence, it's why we have anti-vaxxers.

Re: A quick straw pole.

(Anonymous) 2015-11-01 10:50 pm (UTC)(link)
I disagree. They buy into anecdotal evidence over empirical evidence about stuff they already believe but anecdotal evidence will never change someone's mind.
dethtoll: (Default)

Re: A quick straw pole.

[personal profile] dethtoll 2015-11-01 10:52 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm not so sure, but you are correct inasmuch that I doubt anything here will change OP's friend's mind. Really stupid ideas tend to be the hardest to shift.

Re: A quick straw pole.

(Anonymous) 2015-11-01 11:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Relevant: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZCL4dXUtblg

Re: A quick straw pole.

(Anonymous) 2015-11-01 11:09 pm (UTC)(link)
Nah, people are frequently more likely to buy into anecdotal evidence over empirical evidence when they have no opinion and no education on the issue, too. It's a lot easier for someone who's blind to a particular field to believe "I know a guy who X", particularly when X is something sensational, than to form a particular connection to statistics. We're wired to believe a good story.

Re: A quick straw pole.

(Anonymous) 2015-11-01 11:13 pm (UTC)(link)
You said it yourself, a good story. That's not nearly the same thing as "10 random people on this random site I know."