case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-11-01 02:32 pm

[ SECRET POST #3224 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3224 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.










Notes:

Sorry about early, have stuff to do!

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 042 secrets from Secret Submission Post #461.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Question

(Anonymous) 2015-11-02 12:41 am (UTC)(link)
But I'd argue that's not so much about sexual appetite - that's about the norms and practices around acting out that sexuality. It doesn't speak to male sexual desire so much as the understanding and the lessons that men have gotten about sexual relationships and how to act as a sexual being. Do you see what I mean? Like, I agree that the distinction you're raising here exists, but I think it has to do with patriarchal norms of how to act, not with what men are sexually attracted to.
philstar22: (Default)

Re: Question

[personal profile] philstar22 2015-11-02 12:49 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, I absolutely agree with you. There is nothing inherent about it. It is all socialization and norms. Which makes it all that much worse because men don't have to be that way, but they are.