case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-11-04 06:38 pm

[ SECRET POST #3227 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3227 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Mary McDonnell, Battlestar Galactica, Major Crimes]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Deadly Premonition]


__________________________________________________



04.
[The Walking Dead, Glenn Rhee]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Bill Skarsgård]


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08. http://i.imgur.com/LAq54d4.jpg
[link for random penis]









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 018 secrets from Secret Submission Post #461.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
ketita: (Default)

Re: Everybody's being morons and ignoring that this is a period movie.

[personal profile] ketita 2015-11-05 04:19 am (UTC)(link)
Well, I'm not American XD and I'm not super enthused?
1920s slang included stuff like: Abe's Cabe, big cheese, zozzled, boys being called sheiks, lollygagger, noodle juice, grummy...
I really don't think that "no-maj" fits in with the fun you see in a lot of 20s slang, in part because the etymology is so direct and obvious.

I am also thinking, and don't really have much to back this up atm, but it seems to me that fairly often when in-groups have a name for an out-group, it often constitutes what they *are* rather than what they *are not*. As in, most out-group names I know will not be called "not us", but "them". I would have probably been more okay with a term that didn't mean "not magic" so literally.
(I would give some examples but I doubt I can come up with anything that would not get me laughed at)
chardmonster: (Default)

Re: Everybody's being morons and ignoring that this is a period movie.

[personal profile] chardmonster 2015-11-05 04:23 am (UTC)(link)
It's hard to articulate or prove, really but: as someone who's had to read a lot of 1910s-1920s stuff for my dissertation, "no-maj" rings true. It sounds like a bastardized version of a sensitive term.

"We aren't going to call them Muggles! That's racist. We'll call them NonMagical Persons." And then their kids come up with "no-maj."

Edited 2015-11-05 04:23 (UTC)
ketita: (Default)

Re: Everybody's being morons and ignoring that this is a period movie.

[personal profile] ketita 2015-11-05 04:27 am (UTC)(link)
It could be. I'm not saying that it's awful or anything, but it just seems to me that they could have gone a bit more, idk, fun in that department. Thrown in some rhyming or something (like heebie jeebies).

Then again, I haven't read so much from that era lately, so this is just my impression and I'm willing to be corrected.