case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-11-05 07:38 pm

[ SECRET POST #3228 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3228 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 018 secrets from Secret Submission Post #461.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
philstar22: (Default)

Re: Arguments or criticisms you hate

[personal profile] philstar22 2015-11-06 02:41 am (UTC)(link)
I actually don't disagree with you, although I think that we should maybe coin another term for that type of restricting of speech since "freedom of Speech" is generally the term for the type talked about in the Constitution which is just about government action. But people really do talk about legal freedom of speech as if it applies to private speech and threaten suing people when people criticize their arguments. And that is a complete misunderstanding of the law.

Re: Arguments or criticisms you hate

(Anonymous) 2015-11-06 02:45 am (UTC)(link)
Oh sure you're right enough there. I just think that the converse is also true & people use the legal argument in such a way as to dismiss the political one.
philstar22: (Default)

Re: Arguments or criticisms you hate

[personal profile] philstar22 2015-11-06 02:46 am (UTC)(link)
Good point. I guess just as an almost lawyer I tend to be more sensitive to the former.