[ SECRET POST #3228 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3228 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 018 secrets from Secret Submission Post #461.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Inspired by #8

[(Anonymous)]

I know! It wasn't until I started hanging out on the internet that I realized that there were people who were THAT bothered by laugh tracks. Same with the debate over single-cam or multi-cam comedies. I could see people who want to get into that particular style of filming caring about that when they watch TV, but otherwise, I wasn't aware that was a thing viewers in general even paid attention to.

To each their own, if that's how someone really feels, that's their decision, I guess, but it just seems ridiculous to me to dismiss an otherwise potentially good show, a show that could be very well-written and well-acted and all that good stuff, because of that small matter.

(And how do people who are bugged by laugh tracks deal with watching classic TV shows from the '50s through the '70s? "Dick Van Dyke" and "Mary Tyler Moore" and "Andy Griffith" and "Bob Newhart" and other shows of that sort had them, too, yet it didn't stop them being good shows, did it?)

Re: Inspired by #8

[(Anonymous)]

I think Frasier and Mary Tyler Moore had live audiences, not laugh tracks.