case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-11-06 06:33 pm

[ SECRET POST #3229 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3229 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[Devil Survivor 2]


__________________________________________________



02.
[Undertale]


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05. [SPOILERS for How to Get Away With Murder]



__________________________________________________



06. [SPOILERS for Undertale]



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for underage]



__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for suicide]



__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for rape]
http://i.imgur.com/MtRDOAU.jpg
[link for implied baby... sex? i don't know]









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #461.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Study Suggests Women Are Bisexual Or Gay, But Almost Never Straight

(Anonymous) 2015-11-07 12:05 am (UTC)(link)
Well, I think there's probably a good argument for most humans getting sexually aroused by sexual pictures of other humans, no matter the gender. I think that's different, though, then randomly being attracted to someone in the street. I think it's misleading to call someone "not heterosexual" because a sexual picture of a woman aroused them. If in real life scenarios you never or almost never feel attraction toward women, you're not bisexual.

But I do think human sexuality is probably a lot more fluid than most of us understand, in the right circumstances, or with the right mindset. Labels just box people unnecessarily.