case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-11-08 03:09 pm

[ SECRET POST #3231 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3231 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 045 secrets from Secret Submission Post #462.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-11-08 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Here we go...Red Letter Media talking point...

I'll be honest, I MUCH prefer the way the prequels are shot to films such as Nolan's Batman films.

So I will say that it's a personal preference.

I also think that Abrams has a tendency to move the camera TOO much. He's always focusing the camera in and telling the audience EXACTLY where to look.

Whereas I prefer the setup that directors such as David Lean employed of often having very wide shots which forced the audience to really pay attention but which set up each scene almost as a portrait.

To each their own, but I hate how some act like everyone's preferences are the same.

If you like films like The Dark Knight or Star Trek 2009 which are exceedingly well rated then that's fine. But I despise them. And that's an equally legitimate opinion.