[ SECRET POST #3231 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3231 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 045 secrets from Secret Submission Post #462.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[ninety6tears]

I didn't say fan reactions affected the PM reviews? I was just disagreeing with the whole idea that critics were easy on it? And anyway this so-called double standard applies to two very different ways of coloring the reviews though. Failing to live up to a legacy is a constricting but much more fair assessment than giving something a pass for being any attempt at continuing it. Unless you just are reiteratingt that all of these fandoms are apples and apples, which they're not. I'm saying that on the whole I think it's neither, but since you seemingly ignored the "if anything" completely, I just find it hard to believe many critics are gonna fawn over a Star Wars movie just for being a Star Wars movie especially since sequel and reboot exhaustion has been around for a long while now. But gosh, since I don't have some random anecdotal statistic from RT to back me up I must be way off.