case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-11-10 06:58 pm

[ SECRET POST #3233 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3233 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 030 secrets from Secret Submission Post #462.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
sarillia: (Default)

Re: Free speach

[personal profile] sarillia 2015-11-11 01:22 am (UTC)(link)
What gets me about that argument is that it seems to imply that rights are granted by the government rather than there being rights that all people should ethically have that the government simply pledges to uphold for their citizens. It suggests that rights are a subjective thing that change when you move from country to country. Which is true of legal rights but what happened to the idea of natural rights?