case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-11-11 06:44 pm

[ SECRET POST #3234 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3234 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[Golden Girls]


__________________________________________________



02.
[Boku no Hero Academia]


__________________________________________________



03.
[C.S. Lewis vs. J.R.R. Tolkien]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Pokémon, Leah Remini]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Tales of Zestiria]


__________________________________________________



06.
[The Man In The High Castle]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Marjorie Liu, Sana Takeda, Monstress]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Sleepy Hollow]








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 020 secrets from Secret Submission Post #462.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 2 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Controversial Opinions

(Anonymous) 2015-11-12 12:08 am (UTC)(link)
That's Lewis Carol, now CS Lewis.

Re: Controversial Opinions

(Anonymous) 2015-11-12 12:09 am (UTC)(link)
Ah.
Ok then, nevermind.

Re: Controversial Opinions

(Anonymous) 2015-11-12 12:11 am (UTC)(link)
Jesus christ

Re: Controversial Opinions

(Anonymous) 2015-11-12 12:13 am (UTC)(link)
What? I made an error. No reason to be a dick

Re: Controversial Opinions

(Anonymous) 2015-11-12 12:17 am (UTC)(link)
... you don't think randomly labeling people as pedophiles when you don't even know what you're talking about is a dick move?

Re: Controversial Opinions

(Anonymous) 2015-11-12 12:36 am (UTC)(link)
1. Do you know he's not a peadophile?

2. He can't see this

3. He's dead, who cares?

Re: Controversial Opinions

(Anonymous) 2015-11-12 12:40 am (UTC)(link)
Ah yes, accuse dead people of pedophilia because they can't react/argue back.

Re: Controversial Opinions

(Anonymous) 2015-11-12 01:32 am (UTC)(link)
da, but seriously, why does it matter? Oh no, some random person said a dead guy was a pedophile on an obscure fandom community on a mostly-dead blogging platform! Surely everyone in his entire estate is devastated

Re: Controversial Opinions

(Anonymous) 2015-11-12 01:37 am (UTC)(link)
"obscure fandom community"

We're not all that big now, but we used to be the second largest livejournal community.
insanenoodlyguy: (Default)

Re: Controversial Opinions

[personal profile] insanenoodlyguy 2015-11-12 01:42 am (UTC)(link)
Fucking tumblr ruining our shit.

Re: Controversial Opinions

(Anonymous) 2015-11-12 01:57 am (UTC)(link)
"used to be" being the key phrase there. Most people would be shocked that it still exists.

Re: Controversial Opinions

(Anonymous) 2015-11-12 03:59 am (UTC)(link)
You don't go around calling people pedophiles just because they MIGHT be pedophiles. Maybe this is why people are being dicks (translation: pointing out your error) to you.
raspberryrain: (Default)

LOL

[personal profile] raspberryrain 2015-11-12 02:07 am (UTC)(link)
You were the dick, actually.

Re: Controversial Opinions

(Anonymous) 2015-11-12 02:30 am (UTC)(link)
DA--and by "common knowledge" you mean "scurrilous rumor based on zero evidence." Which is pretty dickish even toward a dead guy.

Re: Controversial Opinions

(Anonymous) 2015-11-12 02:43 am (UTC)(link)
lmao this whole thread

Re: Controversial Opinions

(Anonymous) 2015-11-12 01:29 am (UTC)(link)
Lol, mess.

Re: Controversial Opinions

(Anonymous) 2015-11-12 12:17 am (UTC)(link)
God help me, but this mix up amused me a little.

I'll just see myself out...

Re: Controversial Opinions

(Anonymous) 2015-11-12 12:23 am (UTC)(link)
Wait, what?

Re: Controversial Opinions

(Anonymous) 2015-11-12 10:37 pm (UTC)(link)
Also, the comment as applied to Carroll is *completely without any evidential foundation*, much like a lot of things that people around here call "common knowledge" - i.e. ignorant gossip.