case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-11-11 06:44 pm

[ SECRET POST #3234 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3234 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[Golden Girls]


__________________________________________________



02.
[Boku no Hero Academia]


__________________________________________________



03.
[C.S. Lewis vs. J.R.R. Tolkien]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Pokémon, Leah Remini]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Tales of Zestiria]


__________________________________________________



06.
[The Man In The High Castle]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Marjorie Liu, Sana Takeda, Monstress]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Sleepy Hollow]








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 020 secrets from Secret Submission Post #462.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 2 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Controversial Opinions

(Anonymous) 2015-11-12 03:14 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, this. Don't "lower standards" just to be inclusive, but it might be worth evaluating whether the current standards are necessary.

Re: Controversial Opinions

(Anonymous) 2015-11-12 06:48 am (UTC)(link)
Which is pretty much what "lowering standards" involves: evaluating performance in real-world situations with current real-world equipment to determine if the current standards are actually reasonable indicators of efficiency and aptitude. The answer's frequently "no", and occasionally "actually people in between X and Y perform much better than people who score below or above them".

People flipping out about changing standards for dangerous positions are generally either ignorant and parroting what they've heard without actually doing the research, or they have an agenda.