case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-11-11 06:44 pm

[ SECRET POST #3234 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3234 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[Golden Girls]


__________________________________________________



02.
[Boku no Hero Academia]


__________________________________________________



03.
[C.S. Lewis vs. J.R.R. Tolkien]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Pokémon, Leah Remini]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Tales of Zestiria]


__________________________________________________



06.
[The Man In The High Castle]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Marjorie Liu, Sana Takeda, Monstress]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Sleepy Hollow]








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 020 secrets from Secret Submission Post #462.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 2 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
intrigueing: (Default)

Re: Controversial Opinions

[personal profile] intrigueing 2015-11-12 04:07 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, it usually winds up costing the person who falls for it a lot more money than it would if they just bought it even if they DON'T wind up getting their furniture/tools/whatever repossessed anyway and all the money they spent lost, because the cost of all the payments in the rent-to-buy arrangement always exceeds the cash-down price. They get away with it because they know a lot of poor people don't have credit, and either don't have enough income or don't have the financial skills to wait and save up a big enough chunk of cash to buy the thing outright.