Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-11-14 03:58 pm
[ SECRET POST #3237 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3237 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 052 secrets from Secret Submission Post #463.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-11-14 10:21 pm (UTC)(link)See...this is the kind of thing that bothers me because I absolutely DO know men who will squee and loudly get excited in public and I also know very, very quiet and stoic women who would rather lop off their own arms than make a scene.
It just seems like you're attributing certain characteristics to women and certain to men and that seems...rather sexist to me, to be honest.
Unless women are writing a stereotype of gay men, it just feels like women are being attacked for not writing gender roles stereotypically enough.
da
(Anonymous) 2015-11-14 10:31 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-11-14 11:19 pm (UTC)(link)Obviously it depends on the character in question. But there are plenty of male characters that feel self-conscious about their masculinity, or have to face opposition if they act a certain way.
tbh pretending that sexism and gender role stereotypes don't exist won't make them less relevant for people and therefore the characterization of fictional characters.
+1
(Anonymous) 2015-11-14 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2015-11-14 11:27 pm (UTC)(link)Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2015-11-14 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)not calling the factor by its name won't make it less of a thing.
Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2015-11-15 03:52 am (UTC)(link)