[ SECRET POST #3237 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3237 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 052 secrets from Secret Submission Post #463.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I don't think so. Why would it be? It's based on fairly traditional gender roles where the husband has a job and the wife stays home to raise kids/run the household. They're both important roles, but the former comes with a paycheck and the latter does not. When a marriage like this breaks up, it leaves the worker's ability to support themselves intact, but the other partner has no resume, often few marketable skills that can be quantified in a resume or backed up with references, etc. Unless they can trade upon the skills they've built up during the marriage to support themselves, they're going to need financial support.

And it works the same way if the roles are switched, too.