case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-11-14 03:58 pm

[ SECRET POST #3237 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3237 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 052 secrets from Secret Submission Post #463.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-11-15 07:18 am (UTC)(link)
I wouldn't say it's any specific terms but it's more how it's talked about? Like it'll accidentally come across as if it only really exists for someone's pleasure. Even when they're talking about real people, they'll maybe get a bit too into it where they wouldn't for any other kind of relationship, or the people involved always, ALWAYS will hit on what the person themselves finds attractive. There's no deviating from that, so it's easier to catch it in someone you know.

Basically, if you get uncomfortable with how someone is referring to gay ships, it's probably for a reason if you normally wouldn't. I don't get creeped out, for example, about how some of my guy friends talk about lesbian ships because there's no real difference in how they treat them as opposed to how they treat their other ships (like m/m in the cases they ship it or m/f) and it just doesn't come across in any way that feels like it's objectifying the characters as nothing more than fap fuel.