case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-11-15 04:07 pm

[ SECRET POST #3238 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3238 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 043 secrets from Secret Submission Post #463.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Your most problematic CANON otps

(Anonymous) 2015-11-16 08:31 am (UTC)(link)
I don't get why people on this comm are so obsessed with the whole age gap thing. In literally every other comm I've been in, it's been considered obvious that when one or both of the individuals involved are immortal, you just kind of handwave the age thing, like it doesn't really count.

Does that make sense? No. But neither does immortal beings. And neither does immortal beings who still seem to have roughly the maturity level of the age they were when they first became immortal.

Re: Your most problematic CANON otps

(Anonymous) 2015-11-16 08:32 am (UTC)(link)
Should probably have said I'm a new anon.