case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-11-15 04:07 pm

[ SECRET POST #3238 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3238 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 043 secrets from Secret Submission Post #463.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Writers: World-building and character designing

[personal profile] cbrachyrhynchos 2015-11-16 12:53 pm (UTC)(link)
I guess I'm not explaining myself very clearly and you're very intent on making the magical/fantasy parts of these books the test for 'real' or 'not real', which in my mind isn't the point.

No, I think tests for "real" and "not real" are completely irrelevant. They reduce stories to little more than an accounting of trivial details, which strikes me as being even less adept a form of literary analysis than fundamentalist readings of scripture. Lord of the Rings works as a story, in which various characters confront various forms of temptation and despair in a world in which grace matters. Very little about the world of Middle Earth makes sense unless you assume that this conflict has meaning.

Fantasy isn't, and shouldn't be primarily historical. Tolkien was emulating a body of literature that was more moral than historical. So do many other authors in the field.