case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-11-18 07:28 pm

[ SECRET POST #3241 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3241 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05. [posted twice]


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07. [too big]


__________________________________________________



08.









Notes:

Working late again, sorry!

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 018 secrets from Secret Submission Post #463.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-11-19 02:05 am (UTC)(link)
"Advanced reader"? Seriously? I read those books when I was THIRTEEN. They're popular fiction, not Derrida. People are calling you elitist because your snobbery is totally misplaced.

(Anonymous) 2015-11-19 03:38 am (UTC)(link)
OH THANK GOD I was seriously about to say the same. Crichton uses big science words--gasp, who could ever learn those without being an advanced reader?!-- but is a terrible writer in many ways.

(Anonymous) 2015-11-19 03:59 am (UTC)(link)
That's what I was thinking. I read those books as a teen, too. They're not everybody's cup of tea, obviously, but it's easy enough for people to just skim over the pseud-science and focus on the plot (kinda like I do with overly-complicated fantasy names).

(Anonymous) 2015-11-19 04:08 am (UTC)(link)
Also the science in them is pretty awful, and having it rely so heavily on jargon makes it glaring in a way that the (equally unrealistic) science in the movies isn't.

(Anonymous) 2015-11-19 04:28 am (UTC)(link)
This. I'm kind of worried that there are people out there who think this is challenging literature. It's not meant to be, and if it is... wow, someone's education was seriously lacking.

(Anonymous) 2015-11-19 06:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh my god how is that snobbery? I'll be the person to admit that yeah, when I first tackled these books in my early teens I couldn't understand half of what was being said in them, which meant I didn't enjoy them nearly as much as I did when I picked them up five years of education and reading later. Jesus, I think they're [i]still[/i] kind of "advanced" as OP puts it. It's not something I would expect my friend who reads Laurell K. Hamilton-esque books to enjoy. If OP hangs around Tumblr and whatnot where the average user is still in high school? I can totally see people being assholes about this.