[ SECRET POST #3241 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3241 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05. [posted twice]


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07. [too big]


__________________________________________________



08.









Notes:

Working late again, sorry!

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 018 secrets from Secret Submission Post #463.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Inspired by #2

[(Anonymous)]

It's complicated.

In general, my attitude is that faithfulness to the text is much less important than quality and interpretation - what I want is for the person adapting it to make the best possible work that they can based on their understanding of the underlying themes and aesthetics of the work that they're adapting. At the same time, I will absolutely hate an adaptation if the creator's interpretation of the source material is different enough from mine. But I don't think that's about faithfulness to the text - it's just that the qualities that I liked weren't present in the adaptation.

I do want to say that I think the best of all time at making adaptations are the Coen Brothers. Their version of True Grit is maybe the single most faithful adaptation of anything I've ever seen, while also being a really fucking fantastic movie. It's an incredible accomplishment & tbh for pretty much any American genre work that was set in our world, I would want the Coen Brothers to adapt it.