[ SECRET POST #3241 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3241 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05. [posted twice]


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07. [too big]


__________________________________________________



08.









Notes:

Working late again, sorry!

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 018 secrets from Secret Submission Post #463.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Inspired by #2

[mimi-sardinia.livejournal.com]

I pretty-much agree with you on LotR and The Hobbit.

I feel LotR stayed mostly true to the spirit of the books, if not the exact details, and people who nitpick the changes are being a bit unrealistic about how well a truly "faithful" would go onscreen.

The Hobbit however... well I thought the first movie did okay and was the closest to the book of the trilogy, the second started wandering away from canon and the third got totally lost as too much additional stuff took over the story and muddled it up terribly.

Re: Inspired by #2

[philstar22]

I agree. There were bits of the Hobbit movies that made me enjoy them in spite of their weaknesses: Thorin and Bilbo and their friendship, any scene with Galadriel, all the Dol Goldur stuff, Smaug, and some of the final battle. But on the whole they were a real disappointment and could have been so much better.