case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-11-19 06:36 pm

[ SECRET POST #3242 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3242 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Babylon 5]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Hamilton/Founding Fathers]


__________________________________________________



04.
[The Walking Dead]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Jack Davenport/Matthew Macfadyen/Colin Firth]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Air Master]


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 010 secrets from Secret Submission Post #463.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-11-20 12:02 am (UTC)(link)
Yes , you are being hyperbolic.

(Anonymous) 2015-11-20 12:08 am (UTC)(link)
No, I'm not.

Reread some of those lines in the secret "Shitty plot. Girls with huge tits. Girls beating each other. Flashing panties"

Scum. Not hyerbolic, super fucking accurate.
ill_omened: (Default)

[personal profile] ill_omened 2015-11-20 12:11 am (UTC)(link)
You should probably take a breather, and come back when you're ready to use that word for like rapists or murders, not people who upset you by having different taste in media.

(Anonymous) 2015-11-20 12:11 am (UTC)(link)
How is objectfication wrong if it's not harming real people?

Or are you one of those people who believe all sexual fantasies should be consensual sex in missionary position with Jesus, our lord and savior, watching?

(Anonymous) 2015-11-20 12:14 am (UTC)(link)
How is objectfication wrong

MRA DETECTED

(Anonymous) 2015-11-20 12:17 am (UTC)(link)
That doesn't answer my question.

(Anonymous) 2015-11-20 12:20 am (UTC)(link)
Aaand now you're sealioning. Beautiful. Go fuck yourself.

DA

(Anonymous) 2015-11-20 12:22 am (UTC)(link)
'Sea Lioning'

There's a derisive term for asking people to back up their arguments now? Hilarious.

Internet debate really is going to shit.

(Anonymous) 2015-11-20 12:24 am (UTC)(link)
Sounds like you're not interested in a discussion and just want someone to yell at.

You do what you like, but I'm out.

(Anonymous) 2015-11-20 12:19 am (UTC)(link)
Why don't you actually answer the question?

"You must be an MRA" is a cop out.

(Anonymous) 2015-11-20 01:20 am (UTC)(link)
Funny how this specific style of post, always anon and always in conflict with a similarly-styled opponent who's also anon, ONLY shows up when IP logging is off, huh? Real big fuckin' mystery.

(Anonymous) 2015-11-20 01:32 am (UTC)(link)
But IP logging is on.

(Anonymous) 2015-11-20 01:34 am (UTC)(link)
Funny that anons sometimes argue on a primarily anon community.