case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-11-20 06:32 pm

[ SECRET POST #3243 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3243 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08. [SPOILERS for Longmire]



__________________________________________________



09. [SPOILERS for Arrow]



__________________________________________________



10. [WARNING for dub-con/non-con]



__________________________________________________



11. [WARNING for rape]















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #463.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-11-21 01:45 am (UTC)(link)
I feel like we are having two different conversations. The original anon did not claim that "being autistic will make you like this" or even that "loads of autistic people are like this".

They only used Chris Chan as an example of a person who might be able to consent to some things, but not understand others:
at the Chris Chan level where the concept of informed consent is understood but the full benefits of a cure and downsides of the condition might not be

I understand that you might not like to be grouped with Chris Chan at all, but in this case he was a valid, demonstrative example.