[ SECRET POST #3246 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3246 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07. [tb]


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 055 secrets from Secret Submission Post #464.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Should there be a moral obligation for humanity to have less kids?

[a_potato]

Maybe, but assuming you care for the stability of society and the standard of living for those currently alive, it would have to be a very gradual decrease in the birth rate.

I think dropping just below the replacement rate, and adjusting as necessary as the population slowly declines, would be ideal, if you were going to go for that sort of thing.

Re: Should there be a moral obligation for humanity to have less kids?

[(Anonymous)]

Can't we just get some of Japan's racist robots to take care of us? http://satwcomic.com/robots