[ SECRET POST #3249 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3249 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 018 secrets from Secret Submission Post #464.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, but the women are exaggerated that way to look sexy, which isn't the intent with the men. I don't think it's well done, mind, but the reason for the difference is sound. For the record, I don't have an issue with objectification in of itself, but I do think the comic industry needs more sexy objectified dudes and more stuff without objectification all together.

[(Anonymous)]

That monster with the camel toe is repulsive, there's nothing sexy about it.

[(Anonymous)]

Since "sexy" is in the eye of the beholder, your statement doesn't heard much weight. I guarantee plenty of people find that sexy.

[(Anonymous)]

Some people have a scat fetish, that doesn't make poop sexy.

[(Anonymous)]

For dudes that look at this so they can fantasize about plunging their dicks into it, guess there is.

[(Anonymous)]

I think it's sexy. I've always found camel toe sexy and I hate the term camel toe I am neither a man nor do I have a dick.

[diet_poison]

I...don't think that reasoning is sound. Because as you said it's only being done to the women. The difference is glaring and awful.

[(Anonymous)]

If the point is to make the woman sexy for people who find women sexy, it doesn't make sense to also make the man sexy because it wouldn't appeal to most of the audience who finds the women sexy. It's fine to not like that the women's obvious wank material or think it makes her look horrendous, but the purpose of the difference accomplishes its goal.

[diet_poison]

True, but it feels considerably more objectifying to me to do it in such a cartoonish way when the men aren't even drawn in the same style.