[ SECRET POST #3249 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3249 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 018 secrets from Secret Submission Post #464.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Also, Goliath was lavender. People incisting on putting human race baggage on anthopormophic characters like gargoyles and gems is stupid and short sighted. Try and broaden your thinking if you fall into this deplorable habit.

[feotakahari]

Tell that to the showrunners. In the episode where the gargoyles became human, Goliath was drawn with noticeably darker skin than the others and features resembling his voice actor.

[(Anonymous)]

No, he wasn't. He was a white guy with brown hair. A brown mullet, to be specific. I never knew that Keith David was black until I saw him interviewed but he was the perfect choice for Goliath. His skin color has nothing to do with it.

[(Anonymous)]

It's you that needs to broaden your thinking. Insisting that non-human characters like these aren't created with real human racial features in mind isn't open-minded, it's juvenile and embarrassing. And I'm not talking embarrassing because ~social justice~, I'm talking about art design, social sciences, anthropology. This is basic stuff you learn if you take classes in these subjects.

People who argue like you do also make the mistake of always assuming that putting racial coding on a character is a negative thing, and if you say they were created to look like a certain race we're saying their creator was racist. And that's pretty racist thinking, actually. As long as the characters in whole are not racist stereotypes, there's nothing bad about coding them physically.

[(Anonymous)]

Uh huh. What an interesting point of view you have there, Sparky.