case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-11-29 03:32 pm

[ SECRET POST #3252 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3252 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 047 secrets from Secret Submission Post #465.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 2 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: rant thread

(Anonymous) 2015-11-30 12:58 am (UTC)(link)
Various fandom places. Tends to happen with gender/sexuality/neurodivergence headcanons the most, I'd say. For example, someone writes a post reminding everyone that, say, Steve Rogers being bisexual is a popular headcanon and it's fine if you headcanon him that way, but it's not canon. Someone will reblog the post and say "But anyways, Steve Rogers is bisexual,"

and that's all they write. The format varies, but that's the idea.

Re: rant thread

(Anonymous) 2015-11-30 01:12 am (UTC)(link)
Weird. That kinda convention seems like it would say "hey let's have more discussion," because they're leaving the sentence unfinished, not "discussion over."

Re: rant thread

(Anonymous) 2015-11-30 01:32 am (UTC)(link)
Nah, when the replies are longer, they're always angry and about how oppressive it is to tell everyone that something that's canon isn't canon and how OP hates bisexuals (or whatever group the headcanon's about).