[ SECRET POST #3253 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3253 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Fallout]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Colonel Fitzwilliam, Pride and Prejudice 1995 miniseries]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Master and Commander/Aubrey/Maturin series]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Undertale]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Justified]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Fury, Don/Boyd]


__________________________________________________



08.
(The Pioneer Woman/Ree Drummond)


__________________________________________________



09.
[Interworld]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 038 secrets from Secret Submission Post #465.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: James Deen

[(Anonymous)]

"There is literally nothing anyone but James Deen has to gain from supporting the possibility of his innocence, while supporting the possibility of his guilt is of benefit to so many."

Hi, do you live in America? Because innocent until proven guilty is one of our standards. And sure, people like to trot out "but that's only in a court of law!!!" but the second we start to devalue it outside the courtroom is when it begins to lose its teeth inside it, too.

Re: James Deen

[(Anonymous)]

but the second we start to devalue it outside the courtroom is when it begins to lose its teeth inside it, too.

That is horseshit.

Re: James Deen

[(Anonymous)]

Why? Do you think juries are grown in a lab under the courthouse? They come from the public. Which is why it's dangerous to promote the idea that innocent until proven guilty doesn't mean anything in the public. Because those thoughts get ingrained into the fabric of worldiew, and how is anyone supposed to get a fair trial when the jury pool thinks the accuser should be believed over the accused because women?

If you have a real answer, I'd love to hear it.