case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-12-06 03:28 pm

[ SECRET POST #3259 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3259 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________


11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 085 secrets from Secret Submission Post #466.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
blitzwing: ([magi] drakon)

Re: Opinions people judge you for

[personal profile] blitzwing 2015-12-06 10:14 pm (UTC)(link)
Complaining is one thing. But actual rage, threats, and insults? Over someone's beliefs on a tagging system on a website?

To me, that seems like some seriously whack priorities.
diet_poison: (Default)

Re: Opinions people judge you for

[personal profile] diet_poison 2015-12-06 10:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Ok but that is true of almost anything people spout "rage, threats, and insults" over, and that's hardly a controversial opinion.
blitzwing: ([magi] drakon)

Re: Opinions people judge you for

[personal profile] blitzwing 2015-12-06 11:03 pm (UTC)(link)
You don't see a difference in the seriousness of topics like say, the death-penalty, and "this person thinks that it's okay to post critical posts in the tag!".

Like I can understand people getting salty and losing their shit over a subject the laws of which literally determines the life and death of other people.

Almost any political opinion is about something that massively affects real people. "I had to see an opinion on Dean Winchester I didn't like" by contrast, seems like a ridiculous thing to rage out over.
diet_poison: (Default)

Re: Opinions people judge you for

[personal profile] diet_poison 2015-12-07 01:47 am (UTC)(link)
ok but in your original comment complaining about this, you weren't talking about rage or threats, you were talking about criticism. I don't think it's a silly thing to criticize. which was what I was trying to illustrate by saying that lots of things are silly to rage over so this isn't unique in that regard.

if your original opinion was "people treat this topic with the same level of rage as the death penalty and that's dumb" my response would have been totally different.

ETA: ok, I read the original comment wrong. mea culpa. I do think it's a silly thing to rage over.

However, I stand by my stance that tagging hate goes against the way people use Tumblr tags so I can understand why it upsets people (when they're not overreacting).
Edited 2015-12-07 01:49 (UTC)
blitzwing: ([magi] drakon)

Re: Opinions people judge you for

[personal profile] blitzwing 2015-12-07 01:51 am (UTC)(link)
you weren't talking about rage or threats

if your original opinion was "people treat this topic with the same level of rage as the death penalty and that's dumb" my response would have been totally different.

Except for that embarrassing part where I did in fact talk about inappropriate rage in my original comment:

"People will judge you for any political opinion. But I'm still wildly amused at how hard I get judged for thinking it's appropriate to accurately tag critical posts on Tumblr.

It's such a petty and inane topic, and to see people reduced to spitting rage over it is utterly bizarre.
"

...Well.
Edited 2015-12-07 01:52 (UTC)
diet_poison: (Default)

Re: Opinions people judge you for

[personal profile] diet_poison 2015-12-07 02:58 am (UTC)(link)
So...did you totally miss the part where I went back and corrected myself?

I'm so done.
blitzwing: ([magi] drakon)

Re: Opinions people judge you for

[personal profile] blitzwing 2015-12-07 03:06 am (UTC)(link)
So...did you totally miss the part where I went back and corrected myself?

No, but the original comment was as it was when I made mine. Check the timestamps. Likely, I hadn't reloaded the page for a few minutes and so I did not see the edit until after the comment when through.

I didn't see any reason to re-edit it since the conversation still made sense.

I'm so done.

Kay bye.

Re: Opinions people judge you for

(Anonymous) 2015-12-07 04:10 am (UTC)(link)
Did the nurse give you back your internet privileges? Because I think she made a mistake.
blitzwing: ([magi] drakon)

Re: Opinions people judge you for

[personal profile] blitzwing 2015-12-07 04:27 am (UTC)(link)
I'm not sure what I've said that would make you want to insinuate that I've been hospitalized (or why you would want to insinuate such a thing). Care to elaborate?

Re: Opinions people judge you for

(Anonymous) 2015-12-07 07:21 am (UTC)(link)
I'm saying you're a psychopath who should be institutionalized. A dumb one, apparently. Or maybe just very literal, in which case you're probably Captain Autismo, which by the way doesn't give you the right to be a cunt like you are whenever you post here.
blitzwing: ([spn] sam)

Re: Opinions people judge you for

[personal profile] blitzwing 2015-12-07 03:41 pm (UTC)(link)
You're so funny, nonny.
diet_poison: (Default)

Re: Opinions people judge you for

[personal profile] diet_poison 2015-12-07 07:47 pm (UTC)(link)
"Captain Autismo"...???