Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-12-10 06:28 pm
[ SECRET POST #3263 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3263 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 019 secrets from Secret Submission Post #466.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Fixing A Sue
(Anonymous) 2015-12-11 12:23 am (UTC)(link)Who's a Canon Sue character you know and how would you fix them to be an enjoyable character?
Re: Fixing A Sue
(Anonymous) 2015-12-11 12:28 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fixing A Sue
(Anonymous) 2015-12-11 03:59 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Fixing A Sue
I have no idea how I'd fix that one though. Seems like multiple authors have tried to limited success.
Re: Fixing A Sue
(Anonymous) 2015-12-11 12:31 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fixing A Sue
And also to be fair, I sort of glossed over the earlier comics. When he's acting like a total dick he does stop being so Sueish. I have high hopes that Batfleck will bring out that particular Bat-iteration, honestly.
Re: Fixing A Sue
(Anonymous) 2015-12-11 12:38 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fixing A Sue
I mean, there's no way George Clooney Batman is anything but the Stuiest Stu to ever Stu.
Re: Fixing A Sue
(Anonymous) 2015-12-11 12:46 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fixing A Sue
I think it counts though, because the thing about pop culture is that it's free for interpretation, and clearly someone's interpretation of Batman was that he needed nipples and to have a bunch of ladies get hot for him.
Re: Fixing A Sue
(Anonymous) 2015-12-11 05:30 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Fixing A Sue
I honestly don't know how to fix that.
Re: Fixing A Sue
(Anonymous) 2015-12-11 12:30 am (UTC)(link)I think the movie actually improved their characters quite a bit, TBH. Stewart and Pattinson played them as really awkward and kind of... derpy for lack of a better word. I have no idea if that was intentional or not, but in any case, the end result is that the movie versions of them are more endearing to me than the book versions (which is not saying much, but hey, you take what you can get).
Re: Fixing A Sue
Re: Fixing A Sue
(Anonymous) 2015-12-11 12:34 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fixing A Sue
(Anonymous) 2015-12-11 12:34 am (UTC)(link)The one thing that jumped out at me for some weird reason was the succubus thing. For once I'd love to see a succubus who likes a virgin guy because he's inexperienced and adorably inept and she could 'show him the ropes'.
*ahem* Anyway, I thought the biggest problem was just a case of special snowflake syndrome, where the character has to be the unique/special/best there ever was at anything and everything in order to be cool or just because the character was his egomobile.
He could have been made tolerable with a lot of toning down on the snowflake-meter and a huge attitude adjustment (seeing others around you as being beneath you is a good villain trait or antihero protagonist trait if done well, but not a good idea in a character we're supposed to root for.)
Re: Fixing A Sue
Re: Fixing A Sue
Re: Fixing A Sue
(Anonymous) 2015-12-11 12:41 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fixing A Sue
Re: Fixing A Sue
(Anonymous) 2015-12-11 01:43 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fixing A Sue
There's a series . . . I forget the name, but I think it was by the son of the Dune guy. The main character has no Mary Sue personality traits, and he's basically likable, but he keeps being handed more and more powers that he can use to effortlessly solve every problem in front of him. By the end of the series, he's fighting Lovecraftian abominations no other being could stand against, and he can make them explode at will. There's no way to solve that other than weakening his powers, because his powers are the sole source of the problem!
Re: Fixing A Sue
So in my mind it balances out. I'm okay with really powerful characters when it balances out with a really sucky life or downsides that are equal to the power level.
Re: Fixing A Sue
Either massively super-powered characters need to be minor in-and-out characters, or they need massive obstacles in their way.
Re: Fixing A Sue
I think it's not just that they need massive obstacles, they also need OTHER obstacles. As in, challenges that cannot just be barrelled through on sheer strength. Like people not liking them, or being able to smash mountains but that doesn't help with acquiring food, stuff like that.
I once wrote a superhero AU where one of the characters was an OP shapeshifter. This was mitigated by some limits on his power (if he's wounded, he basically can't shift at all, if he falls asleep in shift he finds it very difficult to return to himself), a massive self-hatred complex brought about by his childhood and serious lack of social skills, and the fact that the plot is not actually about him using his superior powers to smash through everything in his path. It's about the local team of superheroes rescuing him and trying to convince him to stop being a supervillain.
Goals do not have to 100% align with abilities.