Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-12-10 06:28 pm
[ SECRET POST #3263 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3263 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 019 secrets from Secret Submission Post #466.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
No, it really couldn't.
The reason why is also a better argument against the idea that the OP is calling prostitutes 'dirty' - the prostitutes are not considered in the equation at all.
It's all about the pure purity of only boning 'girls they care about'.
The prostitutes could be replaced with 'girls met at a bar', 'their friend's cute cousin who's visiting from abroad' or any other form of one night stand.
They're not calling sex workers, specifically, dirty - they're calling all casual sex dirty.