[ SECRET POST #3263 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3263 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________


11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 019 secrets from Secret Submission Post #466.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[diet_poison]

not necessarily. I don't think this is a very uncommon view though I do think it misses a lot of nuance. maybe naive might be the right word?

[(Anonymous)]

there's no nuance needed, people who use prositutes are trash.

[diet_poison]

I actually would probably avoid anyone who pays for sex myself, though "trash" is a strong word for some of them. But the nuance being missed is that not all sex workers are exploited; some of them actually do it by choice and their choices are minimized and dismissed when they're included in the "exploited" generalization.