[ SECRET POST #3267 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3267 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________


11.


__________________________________________________



12.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 050 secrets from Secret Submission Post #467.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - random advertisement for porcelain doves ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

DA. I agree with ALL of this. A big thing I see happening in these arguments often is that legally wrong = morally wrong which is not really a stance I agree with, especially when copyright law is complicated and tends to protect those with the better lawyers more then anything else (for example, if Disney rips off an artist, and very obviously rips them off, the original artist is still more likely to lose out because who is going to have the legal team that Disney does?)

Art has ALWAYS been inspired by other art. Copyright law and the term fanart are fairly new in the history of art, and it just tends to complicate the arguments when we forget that the fanart/fic are also art forms.