[ SECRET POST #3267 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3267 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________


11.


__________________________________________________



12.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 050 secrets from Secret Submission Post #467.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - random advertisement for porcelain doves ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Artificial Humans

[(Anonymous)]

Honestly, I don't see that running. Celebrities have star power because they have personalities and lives. I'm not for worship or drama either, but if I like things about a certain actor as a person, or if I hear how they worked to become a certain role, I might be more likely to see the movie. Movies would lose all starpower boosts if they only had robot actors.

Robots being "easier to work with" isn't really something we can discuss because those robots don't exist yet. Presumably they'd be expensive. And how would you program them to react a certain way, conveying certain emotions? I think it'd be tough. Their expressions would probably be modeled after real actors/models. Plus, they'd probably need active programmers, maintenance, charging.. so there are a lot of hypotheticals here.