Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-12-14 06:38 pm
[ SECRET POST #3267 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3267 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05. [repeat]
__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 050 secrets from Secret Submission Post #467.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - random advertisement for porcelain doves ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: "Unwritten rule" about characters' sexualities, kind of related to above thread
The thing is, we don't know for sure if the writers wrote with the idea of their character being straight, and if there is no onscreen declaration of straightness, I think it is not unreasonable to think "They might be gay/bi!".
Even if such a declaration of straightness happens in canon, or Word of God (if you accept such) has stated so, Fandom will merrily ignore it and keep on slashing, sometimes even saying the character is in denial or closeted, depending on how fiercely they hold onto their slashy headcanon.
So... I kinda agree with your friend, but I am well aware it is not a favoured opinion in Fandom. For my part, canon may be straight, but I don't care, because I will keep slashing.