case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-12-18 06:42 pm

[ SECRET POST #3271 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3271 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Mysterious Universe Podcast]


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.
[Elias Ericson]


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.
[Danny Phantom]


__________________________________________________



11. [SPOILERS for Jessica Jones]



__________________________________________________



12. [SPOILERS for Homestuck]




__________________________________________________



13. [SPOILERS for transformers: more than meets the eye #47]



__________________________________________________



14. [WARNING for rape]


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #467.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-12-19 12:00 am (UTC)(link)
I don't think the situations are morally different.

I do think there is a tonal/contextual difference, in the following specific sense. The whole point of Kilgrave is that he's a rapist and an abuser. That's his character. It is inextricable from who he is and what he does. He is written to be a rapist in a superpowered context. The same is not true of Regina - those elements are much less central to her character, because they were never meant to be a part of it - they only became part of it as a result of shitty writers not knowing what they were doing.

I would like to be very clear here: I am not justifying what Regina did, which was rape. I don't think that the intent of the writers alters that.

What I am saying is that, when you think of them as characters, and particularly when you deal with them in fanworks, it makes sense to think of them somewhat differently because of that difference in context. Because, essentially, when Regina did it, it was the writers fucking up; when Kilgrave did it, it's the whole central point of his character.