Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-12-20 04:11 pm
[ SECRET POST #3273 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3273 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 051 secrets from Secret Submission Post #468.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - picture with random french lyrics ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Being THAT writer
(Anonymous) 2015-12-20 11:09 pm (UTC)(link)I think it's best to write the fic, not post it, and see if you're satisfied with it.
Again, SoulmateAUs are tropes I tend to stay away from (not because they're "easy") but because they're not handled well. The clear choice is to have them see each other, romance and sex ensues, but a well written one, well, the author doesn't loose sight of the characters and how they would feel if they were in fact pulled into such a situation (assuming that AU isn't code for OOC).
Also, why do a soulmate AU? Why not just write fic of the two characters together? I've seen that done a few times. As in, the characters are already together. You're just walking in on "a day in the life". There's nothing wrong with that either.
You know what? Do whatever you like, OP! Although I get the pressure to write the best you can for smaller fandoms/rarepairs/etc. because of the dearth of fic.
Sorry if this was unhelpful.
Re: Being THAT writer
(Anonymous) 2015-12-20 11:37 pm (UTC)(link)I was looking for commentary on what being a one-trick writer looks like, not whether there's value in the one-trick or how well the execution of that one-trick is.
Re: Being THAT writer
(Anonymous) 2015-12-20 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)