[ SECRET POST #3273 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3273 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 051 secrets from Secret Submission Post #468.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - picture with random french lyrics ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: 50/50

[(Anonymous)]

If some reviewer came to me with "the writing is good but the whole genre/plot needs to be changed" I'm sure as hell not going to be deferential to them.

People who demand shit like that are being genuinely entitled, and they need to be called out. Because that shit is rude and childish.

I don't think authors should go out of their way to be rude, but reviewers demanding the whole story be changed shouldn't be deferred to. Maybe if less people deferred to them they might do it less.

We aren't generally sympathetic and tolerant to the author who acts demanding and like they're owed asspats and sugarcoating, so why are we tolerant of readers who essentially have the same attitude?

Re: 50/50

[(Anonymous)]

but don't you know readers are always right and you're supposed to update promptly and write about the topics they want without asking for anything in return!!!