case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-12-20 04:11 pm

[ SECRET POST #3273 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3273 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 051 secrets from Secret Submission Post #468.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - picture with random french lyrics ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: 50/50

(Anonymous) 2015-12-21 10:01 pm (UTC)(link)
Anon's reply was diplomatic, considering that the review wasn't very reasonable. While I'm not sure I agree there's a widespread culture of being super deferential to reviewers for fear of negative consequences, even if there is, why engage in that? Why should writers have to bow and scrape to reviewers who make bad suggestions? That sounds like giving in to what is basically extortion.