case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-12-26 03:47 pm

[ SECRET POST #3279 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3279 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 064 secrets from Secret Submission Post #469.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-12-26 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)
It is not a reclaimed word because while it can be used as a slur (as any word can) it is not always a slur. And more to the point, it is a word that several groups actually prefer be used by non-group members to refer to them and the lifestyle in general. Also calling a non-roma gypsy a roma is just as, if not moreso, insulting because you are negating their identity and supplanting it with one group which seeks to appropriate sole ownership of the gypsy ethnicity and lifestyle and erase it with their own. Police your own head first, please.
meadowphoenix: (Default)

[personal profile] meadowphoenix 2015-12-27 06:00 am (UTC)(link)
Nah, I'm good, since I wasn't actually talking about just Roma.

It ~not always being a slur, is some revisionist history though.

More importantly, like many groups, that ~preference is not actually consistent within those groups. I'd err on the side of no.