[ SECRET POST #3287 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3287 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 055 secrets from Secret Submission Post #470.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[kallanda_lee]

I think all really depends on who she is aiming her novel at. If she's writing erotica/romance, he can probably get away with mediocre writing as long at the juicy bits are good. if she's attempting literature...ouch.

However, I can tell you one thing: if she can't take criticism and she wants to get published, she's going to have a bad time. An editor will be far less subtle than a friend.

[kallanda_lee]

Oh hi stella! ltns! Nice to have you here again.

[(Anonymous)]

Definitely. Smut in fics I can read like nobody's business. Smut in actual published books? I cringe my way through it.

[(Anonymous)]

Seriously. My writing buddy had to talk me off a ledge when my (professional) editor got done eviscerating my novel. She's in for a rude awakening if she manages to sell the thing to a tradtional publisher.

And if she self-pubs and it's terrible, the reviews won't be kind.