case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-01-03 03:36 pm

[ SECRET POST #3287 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3287 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 055 secrets from Secret Submission Post #470.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
elaminator: (Metal Gear Rising: Raiden - Zero)

Re: F!S Peeves

[personal profile] elaminator 2016-01-03 11:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Honestly, I don't mind even when a secret veers into N!S category. If someone took the time to submit I'll generally give it a read-through, and comment if I have something to say.
kallanda_lee: (Default)

Re: F!S Peeves

[personal profile] kallanda_lee 2016-01-03 11:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Exactly, me too. It's not like we suffer from too many secrets.
elaminator: (Legend of the Seeker: Kahlan - Smile)

Re: F!S Peeves

[personal profile] elaminator 2016-01-03 11:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Yea, I typically feel like people deserve a comment for their effort (with exceptions, because once in a while we'll get a really nasty, offensive secret), though sometimes I just have nothing to say. If we had 50 secrets a day that would be much harder to follow through on, but with our current count...

Re: F!S Peeves

(Anonymous) 2016-01-03 11:27 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah same.