[ SECRET POST #3288 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3288 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 044 secrets from Secret Submission Post #470.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: When do you consider someone well-off?

[ill_omened]

This is overly simplistic.

Class and wealth can't be broken down to mere assets minus debts. Generation and earning potential are hugely important, and there's pretty much no meaningful way to compare a cleaner who's scrimped and saved and got lucky to pull together their assets and a doctor.

Yes things outside of your control can impact your earning potential - but the same is true of all your assets.

Re: When do you consider someone well-off?

[(Anonymous)]

It's overly simplistic in order to respond to an overly simplistic claim that "income is a given" when determining whether someone is well-off.

Re: When do you consider someone well-off?

[(Anonymous)]

*tips fedora*