Case (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
case) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
fandomsecrets2016-01-04 07:16 pm
case) wrote in fandomsecrets2016-01-04 07:16 pm
[ SECRET POST #3288 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3288 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.
__________________________________________________
02.
__________________________________________________
03.
__________________________________________________
04.
__________________________________________________
05.
__________________________________________________
06.
__________________________________________________
07.
__________________________________________________
08.
__________________________________________________
09.
__________________________________________________
10.
__________________________________________________
11.
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 044 secrets from Secret Submission Post #470.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
Re: When do you consider someone well-off?
(Anonymous) 2016-01-05 02:21 am (UTC)(link)You went straight from thinking about stealing something to stealing it and skipped the talking about stealing it which would actually be relevant to this discussion. I can't be arrested for just saying 'hey I'd like to rob this bank' if I take no further steps.
Inciting genocide blah blah blah etc. The examples you gave of saying 'all Jews should be shot' or whatever don't even come close to reaching a reasonable definition of that so if your hate crime laws cover that I would say they have way, way overstepped their bounds. I expected to be suspected of a crime when I have taken reasonable steps toward carrying it out such as detailing a specific not general plan, buying equipment, recruiting, etc.
Re: When do you consider someone well-off?
This is literally why "corroborating evidence" is required, and what it includes. You can't be fined if your statement is without sincere intent or is satire.