case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-01-04 07:16 pm

[ SECRET POST #3288 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3288 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 044 secrets from Secret Submission Post #470.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2016-01-05 09:38 pm (UTC)(link)
It's true that Harlequin is more formulaic, thanks to the whole "branding" thing. But not all romance novels are Harlequins and not all romances are required to follow such strict guidelines.

(Anonymous) 2016-01-05 09:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Harlequin's defined it well enough. When people hear "romance novel" what they think of first is the kind of shit Harlequin publishes.