[ SECRET POST #3290 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3290 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 022 secrets from Secret Submission Post #470.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Yes, of course, but apply that same line to morality is absurd. Legally having sex with a 17 years old is illegal, but it's not immoral.

[(Anonymous)]

The legality of it depends on their age, and the morality on their maturity. But in a huge number of cases where it's illegal, it's also immoral. I would argue in the vast majority of such cases.

The point is that the objection to manga that we're talking about here is basically moral. The legal standard is in large part a convenient, agreed-upon shorthand for those moral standards.

[(Anonymous)]

Actually in some states the age of consent is lower so 17 is "legal" for them.

[(Anonymous)]

if you're 18 yourself, sure, if you're 48 and having sex with a 17 year old I feel less sorry for your creeper ass