Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-01-08 06:42 pm
[ SECRET POST #3292 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3292 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06. [SPOILERS for Hunger Games]

__________________________________________________
07. [SPOILERS for The Force Awakens]

__________________________________________________
08. [SPOILERS for The Force Awakens]

__________________________________________________
09. [WARNING for eating disorders]

__________________________________________________
10. [WARNING for rape]

__________________________________________________
11. [WARNING for rape]

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #470.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Politics Thread
(Anonymous) 2016-01-09 04:42 am (UTC)(link)The thing is Hillary *needs* huge turnout from women to beat Trump. She 100% needs it. And this is absolutely going to hurt her with women. Hugely. Both in terms of the issue itself, but also because it provides a ready-made response any time she tries to campaign on the basis of gender. It's bad enough that it's going to hurt her with young committed feminist women - because believe me, they are going to listen to the attack here - but the bigger issue is that it hamstrings her campaign hugely on a major issue that she both should own and needs to own. And I have zero faith in Hillary's team being able to own an answer to this, narrative-wise.
On the other hand Bernie's also going to have a major women problem if he somehow manages to win out over Hillary. Count on it. So either way it's going to be a major issue, especially since the Republicans are definitely going to nominate a woman VP candidate to go along with Trump.
It's a huge, huge, huge Achilles heel. It is a major, crippling weakness in the single most key group for defeating Trump. Which was already going to be far from a given.
We are fucked fucked fucked.
Re: Politics Thread
(Anonymous) 2016-01-09 04:53 am (UTC)(link)Because I'm not even sure about that. And I'm even less certain Trump is going to get through his primaries. Again, the ten months out ahead of us leaves plenty of time for things to go haywire. Thinking the election's over when the primaries aren't even finished is just silly.
Re: Politics Thread
(Anonymous) 2016-01-09 04:59 am (UTC)(link)I think Trump is the most likely victor in the Republican primary. The main path I can see where he doesn't win is if he both does much worse than expected in the Iowa caucuses (like, finishing third or fourth), and establishment candidates start dropping off really quickly after Iowa. He polls really well in New Hampshire, South Carolina, and the Super Tuesday states, and the rest of the field is just so completely split - which matters a lot when you start talking about delegate counts. It's far from a certainty but he has to be considered the favorite.
And, yeah, it's a long way about, but there are still fundamentals to look at, and they're starting to look really, really worrying.
Re: Politics Thread
(Anonymous) 2016-01-09 05:07 am (UTC)(link)But I'll admit I'm not too concerned about the presidential race at the moment, more concerned with Congress (esp. House of Representatives) and starting to feel sorry for Obama, whose lame duckness kicked in waayyy too early. D: