fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #3292 ]

⌈ Secret Post #3292 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

__________________________________________________

03.

__________________________________________________

04.

__________________________________________________

05.

__________________________________________________

06. [SPOILERS for Hunger Games]

__________________________________________________

07. [SPOILERS for The Force Awakens]

__________________________________________________

08. [SPOILERS for The Force Awakens]

__________________________________________________

09. [WARNING for eating disorders]

__________________________________________________

10. [WARNING for rape]

__________________________________________________

11. [WARNING for rape]

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #470.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

No at all, but if that person insist that actively shaming other is a good thing... well, I'm not going to agree with them. YKINMKATO is better, no shaming needed.

I am the person you were responding to, and nowhere did I claim (let alone "insist") that actively shaming others was a good thing. In fact, my comment basically implied it was a bad thing, which I will now confirm: as far as I'm concerned, actively shaming others is almost never a beneficial or constructive course of action, and I don't believe it is the right course of action in this case.

Now if you consider expressing one's opinions, civilly, in either ones own space or a public forum, to be "actively shaming" then I really can't help you there, because we clearly have very different definitions of the term.

[ SECRET POST #3292 ]

no subject

no subject