fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #3295 ]

⌈ Secret Post #3295 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

__________________________________________________

03.

__________________________________________________

04.

__________________________________________________

05.

__________________________________________________

06.

__________________________________________________

07.

__________________________________________________

08.

__________________________________________________

09.

__________________________________________________

10.

__________________________________________________

11.

__________________________________________________

12.

__________________________________________________

13.

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 058 secrets from Secret Submission Post #471.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

That's just justification due to cognitive dissonance, not a true endorsement of moral relativism. I suppose AIRT might fall into that category as well.

Certainly when we've actually talked about moral philosophies, few rally to the banner of moral relativism.

Edited 2016-01-12 01:34 (UTC)

Oh, I'm definitely on the side of moral relativism.

A rock star in his 20s having sex with a 15-year-old girl today would be a lot sketchier than Bowie having sex with a 15-year-old in 1973, because our society's perception of that kind of relationship has changed on a fundamental level. A rock star today would and should know better. But back then, it was not seen as a problem; the girls felt they had agency, and the broader culture viewed it the same way.

[ SECRET POST #3295 ]

(frozen comment) Re: GOOD RIDDANCE

(frozen comment) Re: GOOD RIDDANCE